Format for C# commenting with NUnit and XML commenting -


When NUnit and XML are writing C # with comment, is there a required, or preferred format for which the first is?

will:

  using NUnit.Framework; Nameshorna February {/// & lt; Summary & gt; & Lt; C & gt; Foo & lt; / C & gt; Classroom test bar /// & lt; / Summary & gt; [TestFixture] Public square Foo {}}   

Correct or will be:

  using NUnit.Framework; Nomestation October {{TestFixture} /// & lt; Summary & gt; & Lt; C & gt; Foo & lt; / C & gt; Classroom test bar /// & lt; / Summary & gt; Public class Foo {}}   

Better?

This is not unique to NUINT - it has no special properties.

This is a matter of priority, but at least for me, the code should come before - attributes are also counted as codes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mysql - BLOB/TEXT column 'value' used in key specification without a key length -

memcached - Django cache performance -